Monday, May 02, 2005

Inherit the Wind... again

Eighty years after a famed courtroom battle in Tennessee pitted religious beliefs about the origins of life against the theories of British scientist Charles Darwin, Kansas is holding its own hearings on what school children should be taught about how life on Earth began.

The Kansas Board of Education has scheduled six days of courtroom-style hearings to begin Thursday in Topeka. More than two dozen witnesses will give testimony and be subject to cross-examination, with the majority expected to argue against teaching evolution.

"I feel like I'm in a time warp here," said Topeka attorney Pedro Irigonegaray who has agreed to defend evolution as valid science. "To debate evolution is similar to debating whether the Earth is round. It is an absurd proposition."

Now wait just a gosh darn second there, Mr. Irigonegaray. Who says the earth is round, you heretic! Someone is itchin' to be burned at the stake.

Read the related story here.

[Update 5/9/05]

Scientists believe that the education hearings are rigged and are therefore refusing to participate in state Board of Education hearings this past week. Scientists said they don't see the need to cram their arguments into a few days of testimony, like out-of-state witnesses who were called by advocates of the "intelligent design" theory.

[Update 5/17/05]

In our continuing coverage of this trial, scientists speak out against Kansas' threat to re-define what "science" is. They want to define it as "a systematic method of continuing investigation," without specifying what kind of answer is being sought. The definition would appear in the introduction to the state's science standards. The proposed definition has outraged many scientists, who are frustrated that students could be discussing supernatural explanations for natural phenomena in their science classes. "In order to live in this science-dominated world, you have to be able to discriminate between science and non-science," said Alan Leshner of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. "They want to rewrite the rules of science."

2 Comments:

>>>>>> Anonymous Anonymous said...

Both sides are retards. Just because some chemicals in your brain say you believe something doesn't mean it's real. Reality is subjective.

5/03/2005 4:01 PM  
>>>>>> Blogger BrooklynKat said...

First you need to put down the crack pipe. Second, the subject is not if reality is subjective; this is not an existentialist debate. It's weather or not children, American children, should learn about science correctly so that we don't slip back into the middle ages.

5/03/2005 5:11 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home