Wednesday, October 26, 2005

Wal-Mart update

We haven't posted a Wal-Mart story in some time and no, it's not because those bastards have turned to the light. Infact, they have been cooking up newer, more diabolical schemes to keep their employees down and offer you big, big savings!

An internal memo (a must read!) sent to Wal-Mart's board of directors proposes numerous ways to hold down spending on health care and other benefits while seeking to minimize damage to the retailer's reputation. Among the recommendations are hiring more part-time workers and discouraging unhealthy people from working at Wal-Mart.

In the memorandum, M. Susan Chambers, Wal-Mart's executive vice president for benefits, also recommends reducing 401(k) contributions and wooing younger, and presumably healthier, workers by offering education benefits. The memo voices concern that workers with seven years' seniority earn more than workers with one year's seniority, but are no more productive.

To discourage unhealthy job applicants, Ms. Chambers suggests that Wal-Mart arrange for "all jobs to include some physical activity (e.g., all cashiers do some cart gathering)."

The memo acknowledged that Wal-Mart, the world's largest retailer, had to walk a fine line in restraining benefit costs because critics had attacked it for being stingy on wages and health coverage. Ms. Chambers acknowledged that 46 percent of the children of Wal-Mart's 1.33 million United States employees were uninsured or on Medicaid... (Yes, the government subsidized insurance for low-income families. So if you hate taxes then you should hate Wal-Mart.)

The theme throughout the memo was how to slow the increase in benefit costs without giving more ammunition to critics who contend that Wal-Mart's wages and benefits are dragging down those of other American workers...

Acknowledging that Wal-Mart has image problems, Ms. Chambers wrote: "Wal-Mart's critics can easily exploit some aspects of our benefits offering to make their case; in other words, our critics are correct in some of their observations. Specifically, our coverage is expensive for low-income families, and Wal-Mart has a significant percentage of associates and their children on public assistance."...

Ms. Chambers's memo voiced concern that workers were staying with the company longer, pushing up wage costs, although she stopped short of calling for efforts to push out more senior workers. She wrote that "the cost of an associate with seven years of tenure is almost 55 percent more than the cost of an associate with one year of tenure, yet there is no difference in his or her productivity. Moreover, because we pay an associate more in salary and benefits as his or her tenure increases, we are pricing that associate out of the labor market, increasing the likelihood that he or she will stay with Wal-Mart."

The memo noted that Wal-Mart workers "are getting sicker than the national population, particularly in obesity-related diseases," including diabetes and coronary artery disease. The memo said Wal-Mart workers tended to overuse emergency rooms and underuse prescriptions and doctor visits, perhaps from previous experience with Medicaid...

"It will be far easier to attract and retain a healthier work force than it will be to change behavior in an existing one," the memo said. "These moves would also dissuade unhealthy people from coming to work at Wal-Mart."

Ron Pollack, executive director of Families U.S.A., a health care consumer-advocacy group, criticized the memo for recommending that more workers move into health plans with high deductibles.

Should you ever wish to vicariously put yourself in the shoes of a Wal-Mart employee and see just why they are so overweight and sickly, pick up Nickel and Dimed by Barbara Ehrenreich. (Big ups to my sis Athena who recommended the book to me.)

4 Comments:

>>>>>> Anonymous Nafta Boy said...

As long as they are the law in Bentonville they will get away with whatever they want to. No one really cares because they want the low prices, and they will stop at nothing to achieve it. It's really not their problem anyway. If we had some form of basic national healthcare without having to be on welfare to get it free, there wouldn't be this fuss about any company trying to keep it's costs down. Check on the thousands of dollar stores that really sell assorted shoddy goods to poor unsuspecting people that spend and average of thirty dollars per visit on real junk. They might as well spend the money on powerball tickets. At least they would have something to look forward to and not have their houses full of junk. As these dollar stores bite into Wal-Marts and other major retailers markets, it causes the major players to try to cut costs. How much health and welfare is given in the realm of the dollar stores? Why don't you find out and let me know.

10/26/2005 4:47 PM  
>>>>>> Blogger BrooklynKat said...

Yo Nafta,

Dolla stores are for the most part mom & pop shops not a giant conglomerate like Wal-Mart.

The problem is that people have to stop being hypocrites. We hate paying for welfare moms, right? Isn't the usual republican motto: "get a job!" Well when they try to actually work for a living and yet STILL can't afford to feed their children or better themselves because the bloodsuckers at Wal-Mart want to sell us, the middle class, a DVD player for $20, then something is seriously wrong with society.

10/26/2005 6:09 PM  
>>>>>> Blogger Fenton Harwick III said...

Nafta boy,

You're all over the place here so let me just try to understand what you're saying:

1) If we had national socialized healthcare, we wouldn't care what Wal Mart does.

2) Dollar stores sell shitty merchandise that merely clutter up your home.

3) Dollar stores are stealing market share from Wal Mart and thus forcing Wal Mart to cut prices further.

4) Health and welfare of dollar store employees is non existent.

My thoughts:
1) Well, the reality is that we don't have national socialized healthcare so we do have to worry about what huge corporations are doing in this regard. Especially corporations that employ 1.3 million people in the US alone.

Also, national healthcare or not, it doesn't change the fact that they are violating the law with their hiring practices. You can't discriminate based on the perceived health of the potential hire.

2) Agreed. So stop buying it. I really don't know what this has to do with Wal Mart being dickish and breaking the law.

3) How exactly do you draw this correlation? I'm not sure that Wal mart considers the dollar tires I buy from the dollar store as real competitors to the Bridgestones I can get at Wal Mart. Last I heard, it was Wal Mart that was putting pricing pressure on these mom and pop stores who have no way to compete given the economies of scale that Wal Mart has attained. In any case, cost reduction is no excuse to break the law or to ignore Wal Mart's self stated commitment to the people & communities they serve. It's called a free market economy.

4) By my count (performed by searching on all business named "dollar" on superpages.com) there are maybe 450 or at best 500 "dollar stores" in NJ. In a best case extrapolation, given that NJ has 3% of the nation's population, the total number of dollar stores in the country might be around 16,500 (33 times 500). If each of those employed 8 people that would only mean that dollar stores employ 132,000 some odd people which is just 1 tenth of the total US employees of Walmart.

Point being, asking us "how much health and welfare is given in the realm of the dollar stores?" is pretty pointless cause no one gives a fuck about dollar stores cause all dollar stores aren't owned by the same entity.

Take a note of a big company that satisfies its stockholders without shafting its own employees.

Or just compare the health benefits offered by Target versus Wal Mart.

10/26/2005 7:41 PM  
>>>>>> Anonymous Blue Cross of California said...

Well I hope walmart can provide great health insurance for the employees.

12/05/2005 2:36 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home