Kansas, the great thinkers of our time
On Tuesday, fueled by the popular opposition to the Darwinian theory of evolution, the Kansas State Board of Education stepped into this fraught philosophical territory. In the course of revising the state's science standards to include criticism ofevolution, the board promulgated a new definition of science itself.
Next week on Science Times Kansas edition, scientists conduct experiments on the buoyancy of witches.The changes in the official state definition are subtle and lawyerly, and involve mainly the removal of two words: "natural explanations." But they are a red flag to scientists, who say the changes obliterate the distinction between the natural and the supernatural that goes back to Galileo and the foundations of science.
The old definition reads in part, "Science is the human activity of seeking natural explanations for what we observe in the world around us." The new one calls science "a systematic method of continuing investigation that uses observation, hypothesis testing, measurement, experimentation, logical argument and theory building to lead to more adequate explanations of natural phenomena."
Adrian Melott, a physics professor at the University of Kansas who has long been fighting Darwin's opponents, said, "The only reason to take out 'natural explanations' is if you want to open the door to supernatural explanations."
*





3 Comments:
Way to much time is devoted to the unimportant these days.
Not sure what you mean. Are you saying that it's not important that Kansas is teaching children that science is evil? That we are going back in time and that our country is now the laughing stock of the entire world? That the U.S. is the only country that even considers "intelligent design" a viable alternative to evolution?
I love feedback, even when you don't agree with us, but try to be a little coherent.
why was it ok way back when to shove darwin into schools when it was proposed. they said
"hey we need more then one viewpoint" fine darwin won that battle.now that they want to reintroduce that there may be more at work than nature, its "OH NO CAN'T HAVE THAT BECAUSE I DON'T AGREE WITH IT!" i thought science was the study of multiple causes and effects until one could be proved true. now since there is not one scientist who will personally be around in 20,000 yrs. I don't see how evolution can be PROVED. I personally belive in evolution, but I belive that "someone" had a hand in it. wow that was long. lol
Post a Comment
<< Home