Canadians and Spaniards Lead the Way for Gay Rights
While the laws in the Netherlands and Belgium also grant gays rights under a same-sex union category, they "fall short of full equality on issues like adoption, ... advocates [for gay rights] say." Today, Spain's Parliament granted full on marriage rights to gays. A similar law was passed in Canada this past Tuesday.
About the Spanish legislation >
The law lacks support from a largely conservative Senate. Too bad for the conservatives though as the Senate is largely symbolic and has no ability to prevent this law from being enacted. Spain is generally Catholic yet this issue of granting equality to their gay citizens is clearly more important than any outdated interpretations of religion or semantics.
The measure, passed by a vote of 187 to 147, establishes that couples will have the same rights, including the freedom to marry and to adopt children, regardless of gender.
"Today, Spanish society is responding to a group of people who have been humiliated, whose rights have been ignored, their dignity offended, their identity denied and their freedom restricted," Prime Minister José Luis Rodíguez Zapatero told Parliament.
About the Canadian Ruling >
Opponents say liberals sold out by getting votes from separatist Bloc Québécois but the liberals point out the hypocrisy of this assertion:
Even before the vote, the Conservative Party leader, Stephen Harper, questioned the legislation's authority because the Liberals needed the votes of the separatist Bloc Québécois to win passage. "Because it is being passed with the support of the Bloc, I think it will lack legitimacy for a lot of Canadians," he said in a televised interview.By the looks of the pictures and descriptions of celebration, it seems like good times to come for gays in those countries. Hopefully, these recent laws will serve as models for open minded thinking in the US. It's so infuriating that people in the US use the semantic argument against gay "marriage" as a way to impose their religious and cultural tenets on others. If they really believed in equal rights for gays they wouldn't care what they called it. As the argument for civil rights has always gone: unequal treatment for any group of people implies inequality between those people and everyone else. Is that what this country is all about? Would opponents of gay marriage have any gripes if they were denied rights granted to others?
The Liberals shot back that the Conservatives had made a tacit alliance with the Bloc just last month in an effort to call early elections.

This one is an update on a story we did back in May [see 

Several of the GIs who guarded Saddam Hussein tell all about in the July issue of GQ. The soldiers were part of C Company, 2nd Battalion, 103rd Armor Regiment, a Pennsylvania National Guard unit from the Scranton area that was activated for duty in Iraq in late 2003. Instead of combat, they were chosen by the FBI to serve as guards at a U.S. military compound where Saddam was an "HVD," or high value detainee. The nine-month assignment was so secret that they could not tell their families, according to the article by GQ correspondent Lisa DePaulo. The article names five of the soldiers who agreed to discuss the experience, with the military's permission.


In the 2004 campaign, Bush basically ran on the platform of opposing all things Kerry and besmirching his opponent's character and leadership skills rather than promoting his own record as president. Now that he has nobody to run against, every day is a referendum on Bush and it's taking a toll.
Nobel Peace Prize winner and arguably our most effective living ex-president, called on the U.S. to shut down its prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba and two dozen other secret detention facilities.
From the lips of retards:



*




